Both sides are currently studying the legal formula for bringing the position before the controversial-administrative chamber of the High Court.
- Courts Dolores Delgado challenged the Supreme Court and denied the ability to annul the appointment of the prosecutor concerned
- justice The Supreme Court reprimands Delgado for appointing a prosecutor with “sporadic experience” in minors before a great expert in the matter
majority prosecutors’ union (AF) and prosecutor of the court Jose Miguel de la Rosa They will again appeal the state’s attorney general, Dolores Delgado, to promote the decision. Edward Stephen As prosecutor of the Juvenile Coordinating Chamber, ignoring decisions of the Supreme Court, which unanimously nullified his appointment.
As reported by tax sources to EL Mundo, both sides are currently studying the legal formula to bring about the new appointment made by the government at the request of its former justice minister in the controversial-administrative chamber of the High Court. For its part, from independent professional association of prosecutors (APIF) are studying the resources to be presented against the verdict or the incidents of sentence execution in the next few days, according to what this newspaper has learned.
Financial sources consulted that considered the Attorney General’s actions “nonsense” and made it unattractive that he disregarded the competence and competence of Prosecutor de la Rosa in motivating the appointment, which the Supreme Court itself called a course. was recognized in Better than Esteban.
“It’s overwhelming because Delgado tells the Supreme Court he can’t review an arbitrary appointment”, “he’s messed up because his decision borders on bias” or “the attorney general tries to amend the plan in the Supreme Court.” does and applies the criteria” that I keep my colleagues and I do not care about merit and ability” are some of the comments that circulated after being published in the prosecutor’s office today official state bulletin (BOE) The new appointment of Esteban, a member of his old union, the Progressive Union of Prosecutors (UPF).
In a 22-page letter of motivation for the appointment of a new prosecutor for the juvenile court, Delgado challenged the high court and defended the “need to give the state attorney general a wide margin of discretion in the exercise of his powers.” Among them, one of the “most relevant” is the “power to make discretionary appointments or, where appropriate, to submit proposals for appointments to the Government”, which must be exercised correctly “provided they are a valid and valid Responds objective”.
In this sense, the Attorney General holds that the decisions of the High Court “should be enforced and interpreted within a constitutional, legal and statutory framework so as not to achieve consequences or lead to undesirable positions for the future of the institution.” ”
according to the norms of